This past week the University of Arizona proudly announced how it is the first university to assign a gay & lesbian affairs director to its roster. So once again, a special interest group takes our hard earned money (our taxes) and uses it to force their own liberal bias down our throats. Not only is it a serous waste of our taxes but it immediately condones a lifestyle that is perverse in order to make it mainstream and give it legitimacy.
And yes it is perverse. Let's argue this point further. Let's take away religious views and morality out, and only looking at it stictly in nature's terms. Mother Nature in her infinite wisdom divided all of us complex multi-cell organisms into males and females. And she gave us reproductive abilities in order to flourish as species in order to fulfill the purpose of life. Life is her purpose and ours. She created reproductive organs in order for us to flourish and grow as species. These are very specific and the two divisions, male and female each have one set of reproductive organs and glands which must work together in order to in fact reproduce (flourish and grow).
Any deviation from these specific natural requirements to reproduce or to utilize our reproductive organs and glands that Mother Nature bestowed on us is not-natural. Now taking from the thesarus' synonyms for not-natural, we come up with: abnormal, aberrant, twisted, deviant and ah yes, perverted. Remember now we haven't brought in the religious or moral perspective into the debate. This is strictly a biological argument. But does the religious or moral perspective have a different set of reasons to also determine homosexuality as perverse? These two schools of thought also use the same biological standard to make the deduction that homosexuality is in fact a perversion. The religious and moral community just substitute God for Mother Nature when making the same argument.
Now that I've explained what makes homosexuality a perversion we can come back to the University of Arizona taking valuable tax dollars and wasting them on hiring a campaign manager to lobby the community and its donors in accepting this perversion as mainstream. And let's not kid ourselves that she isn't assigned to that position to be anything other than a campaign manager promoting the legitimacy of homosexuals in society. She is also there to make sure that conservative freedoms of speech are quashed. Anyone that is against homosexuality must be silenced and it will be her job to do it.
We have covered one side of the coin let's talk about the other side of the coin which is fair representation. Since the university hired a gay and lesbian affairs director and it has a Latino, Black, Women's, Muslim affairs directors, shouldn't they also appoint a White Christian Male Affairs Director? Oh and while they are at it, they should not leave out the Sado-masochist affairs director, and the beastiality affairs director and the pornography affairs director and the cats and dogs living together affairs director and the list can go on and on. But why should gays and lesbians get their own affairs director? They only represent 3% of the population while the white Christian males make up a far greater percentage of the population. Since white Christian males make up a far greater percentage of the population they are making a far greater contribution to tax dollars, much, much more than homosexuals. Why shouldn't their greater tax dollars go towards their own representation at universities than say the homosexual community?
This is once again a perfect example at just how bias the liberal minority is and how un-balanced our representation has become. This country continues to take steps backward instead of forward. It can no longer afford to bow down to minority activists that have no interest in the community as a whole but only to protect their own interests at the expense of a majority of people that do not condone their lifestyles or would find them to be a part of mainstream America. The right thing for the University of Arizona and any other universities to do is eliminate these special interests groups at the expense of hardworking Americans that would rather see their tax dollars used on programs that benefit the vast majority of Americans and not a twisted 3% of the population.
And yes it is perverse. Let's argue this point further. Let's take away religious views and morality out, and only looking at it stictly in nature's terms. Mother Nature in her infinite wisdom divided all of us complex multi-cell organisms into males and females. And she gave us reproductive abilities in order to flourish as species in order to fulfill the purpose of life. Life is her purpose and ours. She created reproductive organs in order for us to flourish and grow as species. These are very specific and the two divisions, male and female each have one set of reproductive organs and glands which must work together in order to in fact reproduce (flourish and grow).
Any deviation from these specific natural requirements to reproduce or to utilize our reproductive organs and glands that Mother Nature bestowed on us is not-natural. Now taking from the thesarus' synonyms for not-natural, we come up with: abnormal, aberrant, twisted, deviant and ah yes, perverted. Remember now we haven't brought in the religious or moral perspective into the debate. This is strictly a biological argument. But does the religious or moral perspective have a different set of reasons to also determine homosexuality as perverse? These two schools of thought also use the same biological standard to make the deduction that homosexuality is in fact a perversion. The religious and moral community just substitute God for Mother Nature when making the same argument.
Now that I've explained what makes homosexuality a perversion we can come back to the University of Arizona taking valuable tax dollars and wasting them on hiring a campaign manager to lobby the community and its donors in accepting this perversion as mainstream. And let's not kid ourselves that she isn't assigned to that position to be anything other than a campaign manager promoting the legitimacy of homosexuals in society. She is also there to make sure that conservative freedoms of speech are quashed. Anyone that is against homosexuality must be silenced and it will be her job to do it.
We have covered one side of the coin let's talk about the other side of the coin which is fair representation. Since the university hired a gay and lesbian affairs director and it has a Latino, Black, Women's, Muslim affairs directors, shouldn't they also appoint a White Christian Male Affairs Director? Oh and while they are at it, they should not leave out the Sado-masochist affairs director, and the beastiality affairs director and the pornography affairs director and the cats and dogs living together affairs director and the list can go on and on. But why should gays and lesbians get their own affairs director? They only represent 3% of the population while the white Christian males make up a far greater percentage of the population. Since white Christian males make up a far greater percentage of the population they are making a far greater contribution to tax dollars, much, much more than homosexuals. Why shouldn't their greater tax dollars go towards their own representation at universities than say the homosexual community?
This is once again a perfect example at just how bias the liberal minority is and how un-balanced our representation has become. This country continues to take steps backward instead of forward. It can no longer afford to bow down to minority activists that have no interest in the community as a whole but only to protect their own interests at the expense of a majority of people that do not condone their lifestyles or would find them to be a part of mainstream America. The right thing for the University of Arizona and any other universities to do is eliminate these special interests groups at the expense of hardworking Americans that would rather see their tax dollars used on programs that benefit the vast majority of Americans and not a twisted 3% of the population.
Posts
